🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.